What principle was upheld in Worcester vs. Georgia?

Worcester v. Georgia is a landmark Supreme Court case that centered on the rights of Native American nations and their relationship with state governments. The decision upheld the principle of tribal autonomy within Indian territories, emphasizing that states did not have the authority to impose their laws on Native American lands or interfere with tribal governance.

The case arose when Samuel Worcester, a missionary, was arrested for residing on Cherokee land without a state permit. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Worcester, stating that the Cherokee Nation was a distinct community capable of self-governance. This ruling underscored the idea that tribal nations possess a degree of sovereignty, which should be respected by both federal and state governments.

The significance of this ruling lies in its recognition of the independence and authority of Native American tribes, allowing them to maintain their own legal systems and control over their territories. Thus, the correct answer highlights the fundamental respect for tribal autonomy as affirmed by the court's decision.