What principle was established in the Gray vs. Sanders case?

Study for the UGA US/GA Constitution Exam with comprehensive flashcards and targeted multiple-choice questions. Each question includes helpful hints and detailed explanations to enhance learning. Prepare effectively for your test and ensure success!

The principle established in the Gray vs. Sanders case is that of equal representation, encapsulated in the phrase "one person, one vote." This landmark decision, which took place in 1963, addressed the issue of malapportionment in Georgia's elections. The ruling emphasized that legislative districts must be drawn in such a way that each person's vote carries the same weight, ensuring fair representation in the legislative process. This principle is crucial in upholding the democratic ethos that all citizens should have equal influence on their government, regardless of where they live.

In contrast to this, the incorrect options represent different issues not addressed by Gray vs. Sanders. The limitation of voting rights to property owners, for example, is contrary to the expanding suffrage movements that aimed to secure voting rights for all citizens, irrespective of property ownership. The requirement for secret ballots relates to election integrity, ensuring that voters can cast their votes privately, but it was not a focal point of the Gray case. Lastly, while campaign finance and contribution disclosure are vital topics in electoral politics, they do not pertain to the representation issue addressed by the court in this particular case. Overall, the emphasis in Gray vs. Sanders was on ensuring equitable voting across districts, solidifying the principle of

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy